Table. 3.
Comparison of the contraction thickness ratio on abdominal muscles according to each position
| Muscle | EO (mm) | Compared with Rest (%) | IO (mm) | Compared with Rest (%) | TrA (mm) | Compared with Rest (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rest | 3.43 ± 1.0 (mm) | 7.19 ± 1.79 (mm) | 3.68 ± .83 (mm) | |||
| Bridge | 3.61 ± 1.0 (mm) | 5.24 ± 1.91 (%) | 7.31 ± 1.88 (mm) | 1.66 ± 1.26 (%) | 4.31 ± 1.2 (mm) | 17.11 ± 9.22 |
| BHa | 3.77 ± 1.03 (mm) | 9.91 ± 3.11 (%) | 7.42 ± 1.76 (mm) | 3.19 ± 1.82 (%) | 4.06 ± .93 (mm) | 10.32 ± .57 (%) |
| BA | 3.72 ± 1.25 (mm) | 8.45 ± 7.45 (%) | 8.37 ± 2.22 (mm) | 16.41 ± 2.85 |
5.46 ± 1.35 (mm) | 48.36 ± 4.79 |
| BHaA | 3.55 ± 1.09 (mm) | 3.49 ± 2.47 (%) | 8.34 ± 2.57 (mm) | 15.99 ± 10.35 |
5.62 ± 1.56 (mm) | 52.71 ± 11.84 |
* p < .05; Mean (mm) ± Standard Deviation (mm); EO, External Oblique Muscle; IO, Internal Oblique Muscle; TrA, Transverse
Abdominis; BHa, Bridge with hip adduction; BA, Bridge with ADIM; BHaA, Bridge with hip adduction and ADIM; AStatistically different from Rest; BStatistically different from Bridge; CStatistically different from BHa; DStatistically different from BA.; EStatistically different from BHaA.
J Korean Soc Phys Med 2022;17:15-25 https://doi.org/10.13066/kspm.2022.17.4.15 
© 2022 J Korean Soc Phys Med