The effects on physical activity
Study | Participants | Intervention(device) | Frequency and Duration | Outcome measure | Result |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Kim KH, 2020[22] | EG:12 CG:13 |
EG : CT + PNF + RMT (RESPIFITS) CG : CT + WBV |
CT: 30min/once 3times/week, for 8weeks PNF: 10min/once RMT: 10min/once WBV: 20min/once |
6MWT | Both EG and CG showed significant increases in the 6MWT values before and after the intervention. In the intergroup comparison, EG demonstrated a significant difference compared to CG. |
Kim BS, 2019[23] | EG:8 CG:9 |
EG : WBV + RMT (Expand A Lung) CG : WBV |
30min/once 3times/week, for 4weeks | COP BBS TUG |
In EG, significant differences were observed in COP, BBS, and TUG values before and after the intervention. On the other hand, in CG, significant differences were only found in TUG values before and after the intervention. In the intergroup comparisons, EG showed significant differences compared to CG in BBS and TUG values, indicating that EG had greater improvements in these measures than CG. |
Yoo HJ, 2018[24] | EG:20 CG:20 |
EG : CT + RMT(flow-oriented incentive spirometer, Acapella vibratory PEP) CG : CT |
30min/twice 5times/week, for 3weeks | NIHSS MBI FMA K-MMSE |
In both EG and CG, there were significant differences in NIHSS, MBI, BBS, FMA, and K-MMSE values before and after the intervention. On the other hand, in the intergroup comparisons, there were no significant differences between the two groups. |
Kang TW, 2018[25] | EG:10 CG:11 |
EG : CT + CRT CG : CT |
30min/once 5times/week, for 6weeks | BBS MBI |
EG and CG showed, there were significant increases in BBS and K-MBI values before and after the intervention. In the intergroup comparison, EG showed significant differences from CG in BBS and K-MBI values, indicating that EG had greater improvements in these measures than CG. |
Jeong SA, 2017[26] | EG1:10 EG2:10 CG:10 |
EG1 : CT + CRT EG2 : CT + IMT (POWERbreathe) CG : CT |
CT : 30min/once 5times/week, for 6weeks CRT, IMT:30min/once 30times/week, for six weeks |
6MWT | In all three groups, EG1, EG2, and CG, there were significant differences in 6MWT values before and after the intervention. However, in the intergroup comparisons, however, significant differences were observed in 6MWT values between EG1 and CG, as well as between EG2 and CG, indicating that EG1 and EG2 had greater improvements in 6MWT values compared to CG. |
Kim JS, 2013[29] | EG:9 CG:9 |
EG : CT + RMT (threshold IMT/EMT) CG : CT |
CT:5times/week, for 4weeks RMT: 3times/week, for 4weeks |
10mWT 6MWT |
In both EG and CG, there were significant increases in 10mWT and 6MWT values before and after the intervention. However, in the intergroup comparison, however, EG showed a significant difference from CG specifically in the 6MWT values, indicating that EG had greater improvements in the 6MWT compared to CG. |
EG: experimental group, CG: control group, CT: Conventional therapy, CRT: Complex respiratory training, RMT: respiratory muscle training, PNF: Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation, WBV: whole-body vibration, 6MWT: six minutes walk test, COP: center of pressure, BBS: berg balance scale, TUG: timed up & go test, NIHSS: national institute of health stroke scale, MBI: modified Barthel index, FMA: Fugl-Meyer assessment, K-MMSE: Korean mini-mental state examination, 10mWT: 10meter walk test